Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...
  • Street / fashion styling suggestion for wearing A679 Microfabric Light Support Sheer Pantyhose for men / male tights / mantyhose with Fly (black)
  • Street / fashion styling suggestion for wearing A679 Microfabric Light Support Sheer Pantyhose for men / male tights / mantyhose with Fly (black)

A678 Microfabric Support Sheer Pantyhose with Fly

Calculated at checkout

Product Description

Microfabric™ Support Sheer Pantyhose with Fly  NEW! Available in Large, X-Large, and XXL-Large only. See text.

Many of our customer have asked us to create a style of support male-specific pantyhose with leg fabric similar to a popular drug-store brand of women's hosiery, so we did, but with more compression! The leg fabric glides well under trousers. The reinforced brief provides support, too, making it perfect for guys who want to be cool and comfortable and have just a little bit of slimming at the abdomen. This style features a lightly reinforced toe for added strength and durability. Even if the fly opening isn't used for its functionality, the lower fly panel stretches to form a pouch to support "male equipment" very comfortably, making this style unequivocally the most comfortable men's pantyhose on the market.

NOTE: This is a new style for our supplier. Initial feedback is that the legs may be on the short side. If you're tall, order one size up to get the leg length you need.

Sizes: L, XL and XXL only. We are not offering this style in M (which sells the most slowly) until we are sold out of A619, A677, and A679 in M. Then we'll offer A678 in M. If you need size M, please click here (they're all on clearance sale): A619 A677 A679

Available in beige. black, and tan. 

Contains 80% nylon and 20% spandex.

Made in U.S.A.


Other Details

Nylon Content:
Spandex Content:
Lightly Reinforced
Beige, Black, Tan

Product Reviews

Write Review

Showing reviews 1-5 of 14 | Next

  1. Great pantyhose! (But...) 4 Star Review

    Posted by on 14 Jun 2017

    These are fantastic pantyhose! Or rather, they WILL be once the legs issue gets worked out. I'm a 6' 230 pound man and am comfortable in the large size of activation, but have had thigh/crotch fit issues so have bumped up into the XL size just for extra space in that region. Given the previous reviews of these being short in the legs and to go up a size for leg length, I thought the XL should be perfect for me. Unfortunately I just put a runner in two spots trying to get them high enough on my legs. I only got two good wearings out of these [These reviews are anonymous, so please contact us via email and tell us your name and order number and we'll see what we can do to make your purchase satisfactory. We regret the problem. Some people have found the A678 leg length okay, but too many have reported that it's too short. - GLS]

  2. miss the 77s, but... 4 Star Review

    Posted by on 29 May 2017

    ...this is still a very nice hosiery. Soft, and smooth, not as shiny as the 77s were, but still very durable. I prefer the tan over the beige, although the beige has a "khaki" color on my legs and I can wear it under khakis to work as socks. The fly panel is in exactly the right place too! Nicely done! The only reason I give four stars instead of five is I wished it had more reinforced toe area like the 77s had. The 77s completely covered my toes almost to the second knuckle, but these barely come past the toenail on me.

  3. Good material, Poor fit 3 Star Review

    Posted by on 25 May 2017

    I love the material, but they fit poorly. The material feels smooth and comfortable. Actually, I like it a little better then the old A677. As others have mentioned, the legs are too short and the pouch is too big.

  4. Good Start on Replacing 677's 3 Star Review

    Posted by on 6 May 2017

    I agree with others that they do run short in the leg. I normally get LG in 677. I purchased a pair of XL 678 to compare do to comments that they run short. The 678 has more spandex content (80% Nylon 20% Spandex) than 677 (87% Nylon 13% Spandex) yet I feel the 677 has more compression, 678 glides less against its self. Possibly less compression because of larger size. The pouch is a little to large. The brief is comfortable but is a little to large because of buying the larger size to accommodate the shorter leg. They are durable, (5 wearings no issues) These are a good start to replacing the 677's.

  5. i like them 4 Star Review

    Posted by on 25 Apr 2017

    bought lrg and the legs were short as always steve took care of it and exchanged them for an xl i am 31"x32" and the xl fit good so go up one size for sure other than that they feel good and i have not worn them long enough to know about durability, but i am very careful anymore so i expect them to last well the fly pouch is larger than others, so know that as well and since steve is working with a new supplier and working out the kinks, please cut him a break if you have had any issues with his new offerings! he is trying his best to please all of us!

Showing reviews 1-5 of 14 | Next

Click the button below to add the A678 Microfabric Support Sheer Pantyhose with Fly to your wish list.